Coping with the future conference 2018

Coping with the future conference 2018 was held at University of Agder on October 8-10. The following are the concluding reflections by the Charmain of the conference:

Dear all, thank you for your participation, and for your contribution to the conference. The intention of the conference was to address the challenges for business and work, in the perspective of a potential systemic shift towards digitalisation and sustainability. The conference did not conclude whether we are entering a new stage in industrial development, or simply enforcing trends that are already on the way. Still, I think that the event was successful, and met the expectations we had, in addition to giving new thoughts and ideas. It should be a good platform for further co-operation. Some key figures: more than 100 persons attended the conference; a core group attended all three days. Some nine key notes were delivered, and some twenty papers were discussed in six session. There were several discussion sessions and two panel discussions. Researchers from several European countries as well as from the USA and South America, contributed to an international dialogue. Special issues of the three journals represented at the conference will be published.

Even though the conference did not reach conclusions or point at specifically tracks forward for the development of business and work, it did something that is not often seen in academic conferences: it brought together both practitioners and cases from practice in the form of business and policy, and from research. It also linked the theory/practice decision to methodological and philosophical considerations. In the future this spectrum of considerations should be part of the debate in work life research. Also, the diversity of presentations and topics addressed in the papers and key notes could be a model for future events of this kind.

Partly included in the conference was a very interesting PhD defence by Carla Assuad, where the topic was the concept of rationality in relation to sustainability. It paralleled the discussion by Olav Eikeland and others in the Acton Research discussion on forms of knowledge. Work life research is under pressure to provide reliable and valid knowledge, and qualitative research in general is under pressure in the current academic and social/political climate. This calls for qualitative work life research that is based on a solid methodological foundation, and thereby one that addresses some of its inherent epistemological challenges.

These three aspects of research: the dialogue between research and practice, the diversity of methodological and theoretical approaches, and the continuous awareness of the epistemological and philosophical underpinnings in the research process, are important dimensions to take forward in the further development both of AR and Workplace Innovation. In addition, one could argue that the presentation by Emil Sobottka reminds us of the fact that research, including business research, happens within a social and political setting, with ideological dimensions that we should have a conscious relation to, not least in the perspective of sustainability. Even though these are not as much in conflict in European business development as in other parts of the world, there is conflict there, and this should be a concern for us. The key notes of Einar Duengen Bøhn and John Hurley, as well as the opening welcome address by the UoA rector Frank Reichert, emphasised the future, and a systemic dimension of the issues we discussed.

Thus,”Coping with the Future” makes it important to see the system dimensions of the context in which we are working, and address the comprehensiveness of the issues we discuss. These should be things which we bring with us in our future discussion of co-operation on how to bring work life and workplace research forward. Video recordings from the conference will be available shortly at the conference website:

I should like to thank all participants for their interesting and engaged contribution, and the organising committee for good and constructive collaboration.

Hans Christian Garmann Johnsen, Clair of “Coping with the Future” Conference 2018

Invitasjon til konferanse: Coping with the future

Står vi overfor en ny industriell revolusjon, Industri 4.0, drevet fram av kunstig intelligens, obot’er og «internet of things» og overgangen til mer bærekrefteige løsninger? I så fall, hva betyd dette for bedrifter og for arbeid? Hvordan blir jobbene i fremtiden? Må den norske modellen endres? Hvilken politikk kan bidra til å forberede oss på dette?

Dette er spørsmål vi vil diskutere på konferansen 8. oktober. Konferansenes arrangeres i samarbeid med NTNU, NORCE og EUWIN, et Europeisk nettverk som ble initiert av EU kommisjonen noen år tilbake og som har som formål å fremme workplace innovation i europeisk næringsliv. EUWIN har lanser begrepet Workplace Innovation 4.0.

Representanter for industri, partene i arbeidslivet og politikk fra Norge og Europa vil diskutere det utfordringsbildet vi nå ser. Det blir innlegg og debatter.

Meld deg på vei:

The socio-cultural basis for innovation

Knudsen, Jon (2018) The socio-cultural basis for innovation. In Isaksen, A., Martin, R. & Trippl, M. (eds.): New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems – Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. New York: Springer. Pp 61-83

This chapter argues how regional economies and innovation practices should be understoood as integral parts of cultural varieties. The discussion offers a theoretical framework and exemplifies with cases from Norway.

Towards a new spatial perspective – Norwegian politics at the crossroads.

The purpose of the article is to investigate how the hegemony of traditional regional policy in Norway has been weakened in favour of policies of a new type, derived from the combined effect of climate concerns and a search for increased structural efficiency. This phenomenon is identified as an ‘eco-spatial’ turn that marks a new policy regime with changing agendas. The policy transition is analysed by drawing on existing scientific literature in the fields concerned, central policy documents, and relevant news articles. The results of the analysis substantiate that a decisive turn has taken place, with the period of transition between the two policy types identified as 1992–2015. This shift in policy orientation has important institutional and political consequences, including the move from a perspective of demographic and economic expansion in space to one of contraction and a subsequent creation of spatial scarcity.

Knudsen, Jon P (2018) Towards a new spatial perspective – Norwegian politics at the crossroads. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography.


New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems – Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons.

This book discusses the latest theoretical advances in regional innovation research, presents empirical cases involving the development of regional innovation systems (RISs), and explores regional innovation policy approaches. Grounded in the extensive literature on RISs, it addresses state-of-the-art developments in light of recent theoretical advances in economic geography and related disciplines.

Isaksen, A., Martin, R. & Trippl, M. (eds.) (2018). New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems – Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Springer.